You sure, Natalia? You sure that remarks about dominating women and women taking over wouldn’t concern you if they came from your male supervisor? Especially if you heard him and another male employee talking about it? You wouldn’t wonder if a gender agenda could affect your chances for advancement etc.?
NOW would be looking to sue.

No employee would get a fair shake from someone like that.

With women – this person used the gender card.

With men – this person used the gender card, only she flipped it over.

That sort of us versus them thinking might suggest what her “qualifications” were. Any guesses whether a male employee would get a fair shake from her?

According to the manner-place-time rule for postverbal prepositional phrases, I actually think Natalia was correct, even though lexically/semantically you do have a point. She certainly wasn’t unclear, though; “for at least two months” couldn’t be the direct object without a defining article.

My God, I’m even annoying myself right now.

And this sentence isn’t the point, anyway, heh. Don’t you wonder how people who are so incompetent got to managerial positions in the first place? Is it all nepotism, or are they promoted by other morons, or what?

Syntax, yeah? (in a Ricky Gervais voice)

You are stating that you were not paid for two months that you worked. That’s hard to believe, unless you are an illegal immigrant and afraid to call authorities. I have been an employee and an employer and the one complaint (to the local labor board, a phone call away) that invokes an *immediate* response is a charge of unpaid labor. It’s really a heartwarming sight to see how quickly a labor board will correct that, and with almost draconian measures. (They will actually freeze your employer’s bank accounts.) Believe me, if you worked two months without a paycheck (that’s incredible in itself, what were you thinking?) you have easy recourse. Have you actually tried to get paid?