<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: George Tiller Murdered in Wichita</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nataliaantonova.com/2009/05/31/george-tiller-murdered-in-wichita/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nataliaantonova.com/2009/05/31/george-tiller-murdered-in-wichita/</link>
	<description>The sky is high. The Czar is far.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 01:09:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: belledame222</title>
		<link>http://nataliaantonova.com/2009/05/31/george-tiller-murdered-in-wichita/#comment-21127</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[belledame222]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 07:33:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nataliaantonova.com/?p=1860#comment-21127</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[and I don&#039;t even think that one was an OR supporter or even anti (early) abortion as such; she&#039;d just read all the &quot;Tiller Killer&quot; crap and decided he deserved to die, she has no sympathy, even though it was &quot;sad&quot; for his family.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and I don&#8217;t even think that one was an OR supporter or even anti (early) abortion as such; she&#8217;d just read all the &#8220;Tiller Killer&#8221; crap and decided he deserved to die, she has no sympathy, even though it was &#8220;sad&#8221; for his family.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: belledame222</title>
		<link>http://nataliaantonova.com/2009/05/31/george-tiller-murdered-in-wichita/#comment-21126</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[belledame222]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 07:31:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nataliaantonova.com/?p=1860#comment-21126</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[and I have a visceral loathing of Operation Rescue and  the fuckers who&#039;ve been defending them and the Tiller murder.  and yeah, they&#039;re out there in full force; not everyone, no, but they&#039;ve been flooding Twitter and other venues if you look.  got into a couple short arguments with people; one was civil enough, with a guy who--anyway, I left it alone eventually.  The other was with this young girl who, when I sent her the link of womens&#039; testimonies about how Tiller saved their lives, how those late-term abortions were of -wanted- children who were dying and the mother was in medical extremis.  Her reply: &quot;I find that very hard to believe.  The parents should have kept it in their pants.&quot;  I just wrote something like @_@ I&#039;ll pray for you.  wtf.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and I have a visceral loathing of Operation Rescue and  the fuckers who&#8217;ve been defending them and the Tiller murder.  and yeah, they&#8217;re out there in full force; not everyone, no, but they&#8217;ve been flooding Twitter and other venues if you look.  got into a couple short arguments with people; one was civil enough, with a guy who&#8211;anyway, I left it alone eventually.  The other was with this young girl who, when I sent her the link of womens&#8217; testimonies about how Tiller saved their lives, how those late-term abortions were of -wanted- children who were dying and the mother was in medical extremis.  Her reply: &#8220;I find that very hard to believe.  The parents should have kept it in their pants.&#8221;  I just wrote something like @_@ I&#8217;ll pray for you.  wtf.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: belledame222</title>
		<link>http://nataliaantonova.com/2009/05/31/george-tiller-murdered-in-wichita/#comment-21125</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[belledame222]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 07:24:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nataliaantonova.com/?p=1860#comment-21125</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sudy has a great post up, btw, recommended reading for everyone:

http://myecdysis.blogspot.com/2009/06/relationship-pregnancy-abortion-faith.html

Personally I&#039;d probably agree that it&#039;s &quot;life&quot; even in utero. I still think it&#039;s a decision that&#039;s ultimately up to the pregnant woman first; it&#039;s not -individual- life before viability outside the womb at the very least, and yeah, I think the health and well-being of the mother (including psychological) comes first, and it&#039;s not up to anyone else to make that decision for her.  That also goes for women who won&#039;t personally have an abortion, found it traumatic or abhorrent, etc.  

but yeah, I&#039;m also with Sudy in that I don&#039;t think either &quot;side&quot; sufficiently addresses a lot of the fundamental underlying issues.  I ID as &quot;pro-choice&quot; because yeah, I do think that&#039;s a starting point.  But it isn&#039;t enough.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sudy has a great post up, btw, recommended reading for everyone:</p>
<p><a href="http://myecdysis.blogspot.com/2009/06/relationship-pregnancy-abortion-faith.html" rel="nofollow">http://myecdysis.blogspot.com/2009/06/relationship-pregnancy-abortion-faith.html</a></p>
<p>Personally I&#8217;d probably agree that it&#8217;s &#8220;life&#8221; even in utero. I still think it&#8217;s a decision that&#8217;s ultimately up to the pregnant woman first; it&#8217;s not -individual- life before viability outside the womb at the very least, and yeah, I think the health and well-being of the mother (including psychological) comes first, and it&#8217;s not up to anyone else to make that decision for her.  That also goes for women who won&#8217;t personally have an abortion, found it traumatic or abhorrent, etc.  </p>
<p>but yeah, I&#8217;m also with Sudy in that I don&#8217;t think either &#8220;side&#8221; sufficiently addresses a lot of the fundamental underlying issues.  I ID as &#8220;pro-choice&#8221; because yeah, I do think that&#8217;s a starting point.  But it isn&#8217;t enough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: don</title>
		<link>http://nataliaantonova.com/2009/05/31/george-tiller-murdered-in-wichita/#comment-21124</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[don]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 06:35:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nataliaantonova.com/?p=1860#comment-21124</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s a God awful small afair, to the girl with the mousey hair.. (Where is David Bowie when I need him.. ?)  Is there life on Mars?  Venus perhaps...

I&#039;m sorry I couldn&#039;t resist.

I respect your views on this too Natalia, but I think by any resonable scientific definition it would be considered life, not just potential life.

I came to my views on this when I was 16.  A very long time ago... But still, I don&#039;t feel like I should impose my viewpoints on others in the form of legislation.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a God awful small afair, to the girl with the mousey hair.. (Where is David Bowie when I need him.. ?)  Is there life on Mars?  Venus perhaps&#8230;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sorry I couldn&#8217;t resist.</p>
<p>I respect your views on this too Natalia, but I think by any resonable scientific definition it would be considered life, not just potential life.</p>
<p>I came to my views on this when I was 16.  A very long time ago&#8230; But still, I don&#8217;t feel like I should impose my viewpoints on others in the form of legislation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Natalia Antonova</title>
		<link>http://nataliaantonova.com/2009/05/31/george-tiller-murdered-in-wichita/#comment-21119</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Natalia Antonova]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 17:54:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nataliaantonova.com/?p=1860#comment-21119</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I respect your opinion too, Rootie. I just don&#039;t see it that way. For me, it&#039;s no less of an issue than taking a bud off a branch. It&#039;s preventing potential life, not actual life. 

This argument gets trotted out a lot, but I believe it - if I&#039;m dying and need a kidney does the government have the right to force someone else to give me a kidney? I don&#039;t think so. I think it&#039;s the same with asking women to incubate potential life. I just don&#039;t see it as a moral argument at all. 

Because sex is not just about reproduction - it&#039;s about bonding as well - it seems illogical to me to carry an unwanted pregnancy to term. 

I know many women who regret their abortions, but it&#039;s more to life circumstance than anything - &quot;I really wanted it, but my [abusive jerk of a] husband said he would leave or else beat me until I miscarried.&quot; &quot;I really wanted it, but my mother was dying at the time and no one else was around to see her off.&quot; I don&#039;t think it&#039;s a choice that most people take lightly, but I also don&#039;t believe in nobly suffering through it if you don&#039;t want to have it. 

I also have a lot of respect for women who say &quot;I aborted it, and I don&#039;t regret doing it.&quot; I don&#039;t think these women should be pressed and prodded with questions such as &quot;but don&#039;t you REALLY feel bad about it underneath?&quot;

I think we&#039;ll just have to agree to disagree.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I respect your opinion too, Rootie. I just don&#8217;t see it that way. For me, it&#8217;s no less of an issue than taking a bud off a branch. It&#8217;s preventing potential life, not actual life. </p>
<p>This argument gets trotted out a lot, but I believe it &#8211; if I&#8217;m dying and need a kidney does the government have the right to force someone else to give me a kidney? I don&#8217;t think so. I think it&#8217;s the same with asking women to incubate potential life. I just don&#8217;t see it as a moral argument at all. </p>
<p>Because sex is not just about reproduction &#8211; it&#8217;s about bonding as well &#8211; it seems illogical to me to carry an unwanted pregnancy to term. </p>
<p>I know many women who regret their abortions, but it&#8217;s more to life circumstance than anything &#8211; &#8220;I really wanted it, but my [abusive jerk of a] husband said he would leave or else beat me until I miscarried.&#8221; &#8220;I really wanted it, but my mother was dying at the time and no one else was around to see her off.&#8221; I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s a choice that most people take lightly, but I also don&#8217;t believe in nobly suffering through it if you don&#8217;t want to have it. </p>
<p>I also have a lot of respect for women who say &#8220;I aborted it, and I don&#8217;t regret doing it.&#8221; I don&#8217;t think these women should be pressed and prodded with questions such as &#8220;but don&#8217;t you REALLY feel bad about it underneath?&#8221;</p>
<p>I think we&#8217;ll just have to agree to disagree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rootietoot</title>
		<link>http://nataliaantonova.com/2009/05/31/george-tiller-murdered-in-wichita/#comment-21118</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rootietoot]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 11:34:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nataliaantonova.com/?p=1860#comment-21118</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I recognize that some pregnancies happen as a result of rape or incest, and as such, are traumatic and can be psychologically harmful to the woman. I also know that I can&#039;t speak to laws in other countries. However, here in the USA, how many sexually active women are there who are not aware that sex can result in pregnancy?  Have these women never heard of condoms, birth control pills, a diaphragm? It is possible to have sex while minimizing the risk of pregnancy. I realize that no form of birth control (beside abstinence) is 100% effective. I have a child (my 3rd) who is proof of that.  Women want to be in control of their own reproductive freedom. I get that.  I still maintain  that life begins at conception, and should be protected.  Let the woman do as she chooses, until that life is there.  Then it becomes her responsibility to protect. Don&#039;t want to get pregnant? Don&#039;t have sex.  Want to have sex? Accept the risk and responsibility that comes with it.  Is your pregnancy a result of rape or incest? Then I understand the need for an abortion. Is it because of carelessness or an &quot;Oh, it won&#039;t ever happen to me&quot; psychological immaturity? Grow up and accept responsibility for your behavior.  Giving a woman carte blanche to abort an inconveniency is...I dunno...I don&#039;t really have a word for it, but I do have a huge problem with it.  It all boils down, really, to the concept of when life begins, and is it worth protecting.

The child I did not choose to have, who was conceived while I was on oral contraceptives, is as much my own as the other 3.  Maybe even more so, somehow.  The child I aborted when I was 19, I still wonder who I was and what I was thinking when I did that.  That baby was nothing more or less than an inconvenience to me at that time.  Later, after the birth of my oldest, I realized that the only difference between the two was the matter of timing.  That really, really threw me for a loop.  It is a big part of why I see things the way I do.  I do not believe my life would have been ruined if I&#039;d had that baby.  My husband maintains he would have married me and raised the child as if it were his own, and knowing his character, I believe him.  I am fortunate, I know.  I realize not all women with children have this luxury.  That does not negate my belief that life begins at conception and should be protected as much as a life that has been born into the world. It is a testament to the character of our culture that we value the lives of our children so little.

Honestly, Natalia, I respect your opinion, and believe firmly in your right to have it.  I just don&#039;t agree with it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recognize that some pregnancies happen as a result of rape or incest, and as such, are traumatic and can be psychologically harmful to the woman. I also know that I can&#8217;t speak to laws in other countries. However, here in the USA, how many sexually active women are there who are not aware that sex can result in pregnancy?  Have these women never heard of condoms, birth control pills, a diaphragm? It is possible to have sex while minimizing the risk of pregnancy. I realize that no form of birth control (beside abstinence) is 100% effective. I have a child (my 3rd) who is proof of that.  Women want to be in control of their own reproductive freedom. I get that.  I still maintain  that life begins at conception, and should be protected.  Let the woman do as she chooses, until that life is there.  Then it becomes her responsibility to protect. Don&#8217;t want to get pregnant? Don&#8217;t have sex.  Want to have sex? Accept the risk and responsibility that comes with it.  Is your pregnancy a result of rape or incest? Then I understand the need for an abortion. Is it because of carelessness or an &#8220;Oh, it won&#8217;t ever happen to me&#8221; psychological immaturity? Grow up and accept responsibility for your behavior.  Giving a woman carte blanche to abort an inconveniency is&#8230;I dunno&#8230;I don&#8217;t really have a word for it, but I do have a huge problem with it.  It all boils down, really, to the concept of when life begins, and is it worth protecting.</p>
<p>The child I did not choose to have, who was conceived while I was on oral contraceptives, is as much my own as the other 3.  Maybe even more so, somehow.  The child I aborted when I was 19, I still wonder who I was and what I was thinking when I did that.  That baby was nothing more or less than an inconvenience to me at that time.  Later, after the birth of my oldest, I realized that the only difference between the two was the matter of timing.  That really, really threw me for a loop.  It is a big part of why I see things the way I do.  I do not believe my life would have been ruined if I&#8217;d had that baby.  My husband maintains he would have married me and raised the child as if it were his own, and knowing his character, I believe him.  I am fortunate, I know.  I realize not all women with children have this luxury.  That does not negate my belief that life begins at conception and should be protected as much as a life that has been born into the world. It is a testament to the character of our culture that we value the lives of our children so little.</p>
<p>Honestly, Natalia, I respect your opinion, and believe firmly in your right to have it.  I just don&#8217;t agree with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Natalia Antonova</title>
		<link>http://nataliaantonova.com/2009/05/31/george-tiller-murdered-in-wichita/#comment-21112</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Natalia Antonova]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 07:31:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nataliaantonova.com/?p=1860#comment-21112</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[But that&#039;s it exactly! I think that anti-abortion crusades don&#039;t just hurt women who want them, they hurt parents!

Let&#039;s say a woman in a country that doesn&#039;t allow abortion (the Dominican Republic&#039;s abhorrent new laws come to mind) has a baby. Was her choice to have this baby in any way meaningful as per her status as a member of society? No. The minute she got pregnant, the state made its decision for her. Even if she&#039;s always wanted this child - she is herself treated like a child, reduced to her reproductive function because she cannot make a different choice. Such laws are demeaning not only to women who wish to end their pregnancies, they are demeaning to women who want to have kids. 

That&#039;s what forced pregnancy means to me, and I think it&#039;s utter bollocks. I think people should want their children if they have them, and I think they should have a meaningful choice in the matter. 

Personally, it means a lot to me that my parents &lt;em&gt;chose&lt;/em&gt; to have me once they realized my mom was pregnant. No one twisted their arm or said that they had to.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But that&#8217;s it exactly! I think that anti-abortion crusades don&#8217;t just hurt women who want them, they hurt parents!</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s say a woman in a country that doesn&#8217;t allow abortion (the Dominican Republic&#8217;s abhorrent new laws come to mind) has a baby. Was her choice to have this baby in any way meaningful as per her status as a member of society? No. The minute she got pregnant, the state made its decision for her. Even if she&#8217;s always wanted this child &#8211; she is herself treated like a child, reduced to her reproductive function because she cannot make a different choice. Such laws are demeaning not only to women who wish to end their pregnancies, they are demeaning to women who want to have kids. </p>
<p>That&#8217;s what forced pregnancy means to me, and I think it&#8217;s utter bollocks. I think people should want their children if they have them, and I think they should have a meaningful choice in the matter. </p>
<p>Personally, it means a lot to me that my parents <em>chose</em> to have me once they realized my mom was pregnant. No one twisted their arm or said that they had to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rootietoot</title>
		<link>http://nataliaantonova.com/2009/05/31/george-tiller-murdered-in-wichita/#comment-21110</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rootietoot]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 22:19:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nataliaantonova.com/?p=1860#comment-21110</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When you say pro forced pregnancy, it sounds as if all pregnant women are forced into it. It&#039;s semantics.
It&#039;s like saying &quot;anti choice&quot; or &quot;anti life&quot;. How things are worded put the spin on it.  In my experience, media is all about the spin, how to best twist a phrase to promote an agenda.  Some of us really do believe that a life is a life, no matter how young, and money isn&#039;t a factor.  I realize women have the right to make a choice regarding their pregnancy, I also believe other people have a right to vocally disapprove.  I guess I trust the media as much as you trust organized religion.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When you say pro forced pregnancy, it sounds as if all pregnant women are forced into it. It&#8217;s semantics.<br />
It&#8217;s like saying &#8220;anti choice&#8221; or &#8220;anti life&#8221;. How things are worded put the spin on it.  In my experience, media is all about the spin, how to best twist a phrase to promote an agenda.  Some of us really do believe that a life is a life, no matter how young, and money isn&#8217;t a factor.  I realize women have the right to make a choice regarding their pregnancy, I also believe other people have a right to vocally disapprove.  I guess I trust the media as much as you trust organized religion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Natalia Antonova</title>
		<link>http://nataliaantonova.com/2009/05/31/george-tiller-murdered-in-wichita/#comment-21109</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Natalia Antonova]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 21:04:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nataliaantonova.com/?p=1860#comment-21109</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, I also work in the media, and I do interact with people on a regular basis to talk about women&#039;s issues. I think that &quot;pro-life&quot; is a red herring - it&#039;s &quot;pro-forced pregnancy.&quot; This doesn&#039;t mean that some folks don&#039;t have compassion, or that they don&#039;t care about alternative means, but when I read announcements for &quot;special prayer services for women who have murdered their children in the womb&quot; on the doors of the church I visit, I have to laugh. (Not at the women who are being told that they are murderers - especially since many people in Ukraine have trouble starting families due to financial problems; I think that aborting a genuinely wanted pregnancy is no joke)

It&#039;s so transparent. Sure the priests might think they&#039;re doing God&#039;s work, but for the central church leadership - it&#039;s always been an issue of demographics and socio-political status. More unwanted pregnancies? More parishioners. And if they&#039;re unwanted, it probably means they&#039;re poor and miserable too. Which works out great for the powers that be, because the poor and miserable don&#039;t question leadership a whole lot.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I also work in the media, and I do interact with people on a regular basis to talk about women&#8217;s issues. I think that &#8220;pro-life&#8221; is a red herring &#8211; it&#8217;s &#8220;pro-forced pregnancy.&#8221; This doesn&#8217;t mean that some folks don&#8217;t have compassion, or that they don&#8217;t care about alternative means, but when I read announcements for &#8220;special prayer services for women who have murdered their children in the womb&#8221; on the doors of the church I visit, I have to laugh. (Not at the women who are being told that they are murderers &#8211; especially since many people in Ukraine have trouble starting families due to financial problems; I think that aborting a genuinely wanted pregnancy is no joke)</p>
<p>It&#8217;s so transparent. Sure the priests might think they&#8217;re doing God&#8217;s work, but for the central church leadership &#8211; it&#8217;s always been an issue of demographics and socio-political status. More unwanted pregnancies? More parishioners. And if they&#8217;re unwanted, it probably means they&#8217;re poor and miserable too. Which works out great for the powers that be, because the poor and miserable don&#8217;t question leadership a whole lot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rootietoot</title>
		<link>http://nataliaantonova.com/2009/05/31/george-tiller-murdered-in-wichita/#comment-21108</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rootietoot]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 20:34:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nataliaantonova.com/?p=1860#comment-21108</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think you&#039;re generalizing based on what you read/hear in the media, and we all know how objective they are.  When that&#039;s where the information comes from, what else is one to do? I do it, too.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you&#8217;re generalizing based on what you read/hear in the media, and we all know how objective they are.  When that&#8217;s where the information comes from, what else is one to do? I do it, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

