Comments on: “Fully sexually available to men”? Haven’t we been through this? http://nataliaantonova.com/2009/12/21/fully-sexually-available-to-men-havent-we-been-through-this/ The sky is high. The Czar is far. Sun, 27 May 2012 07:08:04 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: Safiya Outlines http://nataliaantonova.com/2009/12/21/fully-sexually-available-to-men-havent-we-been-through-this/#comment-22583 Wed, 30 Dec 2009 04:18:11 +0000 http://nataliaantonova.com/?p=2504#comment-22583 The comments thread is even worse. It’s full of statements that are so nasty and hateful, they could have come out of that microwave at the end of Time bandits.

]]> By: Emily http://nataliaantonova.com/2009/12/21/fully-sexually-available-to-men-havent-we-been-through-this/#comment-22563 Thu, 24 Dec 2009 13:49:14 +0000 http://nataliaantonova.com/?p=2504#comment-22563 Gosh, that’s a horrendous post by factcheckme! However, I’m really heartened by the number of cis people who have taken the time to take her to task (everyone here, included). Thank you! :)

Unfortunately, these hate-filled people are always going to be popping up and it takes a huge amount of energy to even get them to listen. Oh well… Sigh

]]> By: Natalia Antonova http://nataliaantonova.com/2009/12/21/fully-sexually-available-to-men-havent-we-been-through-this/#comment-22557 Tue, 22 Dec 2009 19:31:26 +0000 http://nataliaantonova.com/?p=2504#comment-22557 Emmy, why do you keep putting a gun to my head and telling me I can’t leave the house?! Why, God, why???

(Er, not that the Taliban is a remotely funny phenomenon)

]]> By: Caroline http://nataliaantonova.com/2009/12/21/fully-sexually-available-to-men-havent-we-been-through-this/#comment-22555 Tue, 22 Dec 2009 18:52:30 +0000 http://nataliaantonova.com/?p=2504#comment-22555 You should see Nicky’s comment at factcheckme’s, it’s precious. I believe the words “the Transgender Taliban” were used. Cos Emmy, you know you just be out trying to scare us cis-folk! Big bad evil bunneh!

]]> By: Natalia Antonova http://nataliaantonova.com/2009/12/21/fully-sexually-available-to-men-havent-we-been-through-this/#comment-22554 Tue, 22 Dec 2009 17:48:40 +0000 http://nataliaantonova.com/?p=2504#comment-22554 You’re probably correct.

]]> By: queenemily http://nataliaantonova.com/2009/12/21/fully-sexually-available-to-men-havent-we-been-through-this/#comment-22551 Tue, 22 Dec 2009 15:52:37 +0000 http://nataliaantonova.com/?p=2504#comment-22551 I think the “trans dogma crap” = treating trans people with basic respect.

]]> By: Natalia Antonova http://nataliaantonova.com/2009/12/21/fully-sexually-available-to-men-havent-we-been-through-this/#comment-22549 Tue, 22 Dec 2009 10:59:12 +0000 http://nataliaantonova.com/?p=2504#comment-22549 What exactly is “the trans dogma crap”?

]]> By: Nicky http://nataliaantonova.com/2009/12/21/fully-sexually-available-to-men-havent-we-been-through-this/#comment-22546 Tue, 22 Dec 2009 06:07:03 +0000 http://nataliaantonova.com/?p=2504#comment-22546 That’s why like feminist, intersex people such as my self are not buying into the trans dogma crap either.

]]> By: GallingGalla http://nataliaantonova.com/2009/12/21/fully-sexually-available-to-men-havent-we-been-through-this/#comment-22543 Tue, 22 Dec 2009 01:07:43 +0000 http://nataliaantonova.com/?p=2504#comment-22543 factcheckme is one hate-filled piece of work, ain’t she?

]]>